AO2 – LANGUAGE/IMAGERY/STRUCTURE =
well-developed and consistently detailed discussion of effects (including dramatic effects) of language, form and structure excellent and consistently effective use of analytical methods consistently effective use of quotations and references to text, critically addressed, blended into discussion
Remember,
Jacobeans would go to ‘hear’ a play (think about the 'audio' in the word 'audience') rather than see it; a
huge part of this effect is what one critic has called an “a kind of imagistic
unconscious” as if the language and imagery are working on the audience without
them even knowing it! When we watch the play, then, images and words flow into
our brains, stimulating much more than the bare stage of the Globe could ever
achieve. Director Peter Brook puts it this way: “Shakespeare could conjure up images
such that, if you could chop open the head of anybody watching his play and
pull out the impression from the brain, you’d get something more like a piece
of pop art than anything else. Because the effect on the mind is that... every
single thing under the sun is possible
LANGUAGE
Hyperbole – This is described as an essential
figure of speech in the play “which helps mark the ascent of the lovers from
failed protagonists to creators of their own imaginative destiny.”
This includes superlatives (the ‘most’, the
‘best’, the ‘highest’, or conversely the ‘least’ etc).
Antithesis/Oppositions
(Molly Mahood talks of the play’s “blend of
the mundane and the cosmic.”) Contrasting images of measure and overflow,
heroic past and tarnished present, myth and reality, time and death, mutability
and eternal changelessness, seriousness and sport, action versus lack of
purpose, creation and decay.
Paradox
Repeated words
IMAGERY
Dissolution (‘a favourite subject of poetic
imagination’), but also a reality in the theatre. Also includes ideas of melting and vacillation.
The Elements
Natural symbolism of the elements and the
ascent from water and land to air and fire.
Military Imagery of swords and armour
Emasculation
The world (also universal/cosmic imagery)
–
just like medieval drama.
Self-dramatization/metadrama
– “all the world’s a stage”
Religious imagery, often inspired by the Book
of Revelation (btw, which is often read as an anti-Roman tract!); or the
Gospel; or from Greek/Egyptian mythology.
Roman vs Egyptian language/imagery
Michael Lloyd – “all the Romans speak with
a single tongue.”David Bevington: “language distinguishes Rome from Egypt: Rome
is a place of words and voices where love and war are talked about, whereas
Egypt is a place of actions and the body where love and war are made.”
Caesar’s speech lacks imagination - he is a
rhetorician
Egyptian style: sensuous, self-indulgent,
ornate, poetic.
Food
Fertility
STRUCTURE
Dramatic Structure: the form of the play is unique amongst Shakespeare’s tragedies –
over 40 scenes, marked by ‘flux’ (stage empties, then people come back on),
over 220 entrances and exits. As a result some critics argue it is ‘well-nigh
unstageable.’ Jumping back and forth from Egypt to Rome, the structure is
almost cinematic.
There is also NO documented staging
during Shakespeare’s life.
A public play – there are hardly any moments in
the play that allow for privacy. A & C are almost never found alone
on stage. This intensifies the theme of performance, as there is always an
audience for the lead characters.
Act 3? Dizzyingly fast; here we mainly
see Roman men engaged in power politics
Act 4 and 5
Although as a tragedy we’d expect to see
changes, these two acts are fascinatingly different in tone from the previous
three. Is Antony being abandoned by his Gods a possible pivot point?
Juxtaposition
The magic of Shakespeare’s stagecraft is
especially evident in his juxtaposition of scenes.
Time
The instability of time – we’re unable to
find a fixed locus of commitment in the enduring present and so is forced to
vacillate continually between future and past, anticipation and memory… Time is
no one’s friend except perhaps Caesar’s, and even he is cheated of what he
especially desires.
John Wilders – “when they do express love
it is seldom experienced in the present but remembered from the past.” Antony,
however, tends to focus on the present, here and now – trying to discover new
ideals of selfhood.
Messengers
Use of messengers and the uncertainty of
knowing whether messages are true or not, provides a key to the play’s own
ambiguity of meaning.
Exits – This includes the structural motif of
desertion
Stage-directions
Bathos (comedy) – there is a tendency in the
play, which is almost comic, to deflate the heroism/mythology of its legendary
characters.
Exteriority vs Interiority
No comments:
Post a Comment